I hope to incorporate randomness as a touch of freedom to the well ordered code if I am intending to make a work of art, but use it as a functional tool if the work is to be of practical use. I wouldn’t want to use too much randomness, and I don’t want to make randomness the center of focus. The video mentioned randomness and chance and demonstrated it as a novel and individual element in art, which deviates from my understanding of what art is. The speaker seems to be defining randomness using its most limited definition: true randomness generated without bias, unlike what the human brain would give, and claimed that artistis used to be responsible for order. I personaly would like to believe that randomness is not so strictly defined, and that artists, especially the abstractionist, are probably the most random people among the population apart from psychopaths. They are the human end of randomess, and what they exhibit is a randomness enriched with meaning, emotion and expression.
This is why the way the speaker uses randomness as an artist is not something I would agree with. I believe art should be something more than the shapes and forms of the surface. The beauty ought to lie in the emotions and expression depicted through the work. There is a soul behind the cavas, whether physical or electronic. The extend to which the speaker pursures randomness is excessive. It is more a research of randomness rather than art. The lines and shapes created contain no meaning, and is a mere experiment that is goodlooking. There is no soul behind this. I don’t see this differently as a graph that may be formed from the data of a failed scientific experiment. The scale of randomness in art I would prefer is when the artist tries to express something through the randomness. For example: A work of random lines and connections that resulted from controlled code and processing afterwards that is aimed at expressing the pressure of modernlife and slight moments of relaxation people find within (I have this in my mind as a graph of crowded random lines where the gaps are bigger in some places). This would be my ideal of the scale of randomness: controlled and not covering over the emotions or the “soul”.