I agree with all of the author’s points that everything has a time, place, and purpose, especially when it comes to design. Sometimes, we need something that balances utility, aesthetics, and practicality. The author highlights that “design is preferable depending on the occasion, the context, and above all, upon my mood.”
The author also emphasizes that in cases of emergency, when people are stressed, they tend to forget how to use things effectively. In this situation, functionality plays a bigger role, which supports his point that design depends on occasion and context. Context plays a major role in many things—it determines how different aspects are prioritized. For example, when designing an emergency exit door, should I focus on making it visually appealing, or ensure that it works effectively in an emergency and does not cause an accidental stampede due to a design flaw?
I do not think the author is biased at all; in fact, I find his ideas and explanations quite objective. My beliefs largely align with his. However, I also think that aesthetics sometimes fail to consider usability. In many cases, we need both. For example, in Qatar, some cities are inspired by European architecture, such as outdoor restaurants or cafés. However, since the weather is not suitable for outdoor seating most of the year, these spaces often go unused about 90% of the time. My question would be when would be a time where functionality is not need or not important in our daily lives?