The reading mentioned that computer vision works best when the artist helps the computer by controlling things like lighting, background, and contrast. Before reading this, I mostly thought of computer vision as a coding problem, but the reading made it feel more like a design problem too, which I liked because it connects the technical side to the creative side of interactive art. It also made me think about my own project, because even simple interactions can fail if the setup is not clear enough for the user or the system.
The reading also made me think more critically about how easily tracking can become part of an experience without users really thinking about it. In interactive art, tracking can make the work feel more immersive, but it can also feel invasive depending on how it is used. I do not necessarily think computer vision is automatically bad in art, but I do think it raises questions about consent and comfort. It made me wonder how artists can make interactive work engaging while still being clear and respectful about what is being tracked.