In his talk, Casey Reas explores how generative art uses code, rules, and chance operations to create dynamic and unpredictable visuals, showing that creativity comes from both structure and chance. I found it particularly interesting when Reas explained that generative art is a space where structured rules interact with randomness, because when people generally think of coding, they assume there’s always a “right” way to do it, but I don’t necessarily think that’s true. I agree with Reas on this point about how chaos and order thrive together in generative art. But at first, I was one of the people who thought coding was strict and bound by certain rules to follow, now I see that it can be more playful and freeing.
When I was coding my artwork assignment, I decided to add randomized colors to my code to make it more exciting every time I run the code. The outcome always comes out as different and unique from the one before it, and I enjoyed the unpredictability of it. At the same time, I wonder if too much randomness could take away from the artist’s control. Reas seems to always see randomness in a positive way, but I’m not sure I fully agree with that. Personally, I think it works best when theres a balance, where the structure I write in the code guides the randomness so that the results are still under my control to some extent.