Most modern discoveries are build on foundational concepts that have been around for years. We are nothing without the knowledge of those who came before us. Which is why it is very insightful to dive into the previous works in the field of physical computing, going through the best and the not so best inventions and creations. Everyone is fixated on creating the next new thing that we forget the importance of building on and improving previous works and ideas. Through reading about these works, I was without a doubt inspired for future projects on how to integrate physical computing. It brought to my attention crucial elements that I would have otherwise overlooked such as the importance of balancing aesthetics and functionality. Projects such as the video mirrors had aesthetics as the central focus foregoing any structural interaction. While the lack of valuable interaction is a valid concern, it did get me thinking on the importance of interaction and if there is value that comes from aesthetics that makes overlooking interaction the correct move. This ties in with themes from the previous readings that discussed the balance between aesthetics and functionality, a concept which I believe were put to the test in these projects.
“Set the Stage, Then Shut Up and Listen” is a harsh message to the artists of interactive art, yet it is an important one as well. Creating interactive art is a collaborative effort, like a puzzle where the artist only has half the pieces and needs to guide the participants so they could place the remaining ones. It is a reflection of the creator of the work as well as every person that choses to interact with it. A dynamic conversation where the artists becomes primarily a listener, following the guide of the consumers of their work. It is tempting to share the message behind a work, especially when you spent a long time developing it and integrating a message within it. Though, how can you conclude and solidify a message when the work has not been interacted with and spoken to from outside contributors. On the other hand, I do think that it is important to find a balance, where there is a foundational message that the work is being built on, one that can be altered and developed by outsiders. As without a strong foundation a project is at a risk of being void of a message to be build on by the participants. Once again, we are in a position where a balance is crucial to the building of a meaningful and engaging work.