One thing that frustrates me is the complexity of using ACs on campus. Despite using them regularly, I have never fully mastered their functions beyond adjusting the temperature. This might seem minor, but it highlights a larger issue—many devices include extra features without clear instructions or intuitive design. Manufacturers often add numerous buttons and settings beyond a device’s core function, but without proper labeling or guidance, users are left guessing. For example, dryers come with multiple buttons beyond basic power and fabric selection, yet their purposes are unclear. Without clear signifiers, users may misuse the device, leading to frustration or even damage. A simple improvement would be better labeling, intuitive icons, or brief explanations to enhance usability and ensure users get the most out of these everyday appliances.
With respect to interactive media, one beneficial concept from the reading is the importance of contributions from people in other disciplines. As Norman states toward the end of the reading, “Design requires the cooperative efforts of multiple disciplines.” I could seek feedback from non-CS students or those without an interactive design background to determine whether my interface is easy to navigate without prior technical knowledge. For example, art students may provide insights on clarity and aesthetic appeal, ensuring the design is both functional and visually engaging. By actively involving diverse perspectives, I can create interactive media that is more intuitive, inclusive, and user-friendly, making my designs accessible to a wider audience rather than just functional for me.