“The only reason your mind doesn’t explode every morning from the sheer awesomeness of your balletic achievement is that everyone else in the world can do this as well.” I think this reading made so much sense after the previous reading, Physical computing greatest hits(and misses). After seeing pieces like video mirrors and the body-as-a-cursor, or after actively using facial recognition on phones where our body is at command and not just our fingers, I definitely think the future of interaction goes way beyond the capacities of our hands.
The first in-class assignment we had for the physical computing part of the class, where we had to make a creative switch that did not use hands, it was very hard to think of something to make. This does highlight the challenge that we need to break away from established norms and thinking beyond the limitations of familiar interaction methods.
A question that stuck with me was how do we manipulate things? But how I perceive his explanation on this and think about it is, how do we manipulate them into a way that they are intuitive? Will the dynamic mediums Bret Victor talks about, be intuitive right from the start or will they take years of trials, feedbacks and usage to finally be called familiar and usable by ‘common sense’. I also appreciate the follow up article with his responses to the comments. His reply to the brain interfaces comment is quite nice and reassuring in a world where people believe automating all the work is way more efficient since humans are way more prone to making errors. I also like the insight on the psychological and cognitive aspects but not fully clear on the Matti Bergstrom quote about finger blindness.
My takeaway from this reading would be that our interaction with digital media and devices should not have consequences to our physical body and the idea of everything we do mediated by a computer might not be a good one.