The reading discusses the concept of interactivity, highlighting its overuse and misconceptions. The author defines interactivity as a conversational process involving listening, thinking, and speaking alternately. They note that despite interactivity being recognized as important in computing, it’s often misunderstood.
The author proposes viewing interactivity as a spectrum rather than a binary state, akin to measuring weight. They emphasize the importance of considering nuances and subjective evaluations when discussing interactivity. Additionally, the reading addresses misconceptions about interactivity, such as the belief that reading is interactive After reading the text, I find myself reflecting on the complexity of the concept of interactivity.
The author’s comparison of interactivity to a conversation resonated with me, as it captures the essence of genuine interaction. I appreciate the author’s call to view interactivity as a spectrum, which allows for a more nuanced understanding of its manifestations. Furthermore, the discussion on misconceptions about interactivity, particularly regarding reading, prompts me to reconsider my assumptions.