After reading, my initial thought was how, in the real world today, we are always competing to make inventions that already function smoothly look fancy and aesthetically futuristic. This causes us to overlook the importance of simple designs that just work. The examples given in the text, like doors, switches, and stoves, are good examples of how, in today’s world, simple objects can become confusing when designed poorly just for the sake of appearance. In my opinion, I appreciate good design when it works easily, rather than the overcomplicated ones that frustrate me. For example, when he talked about his friend’s experience with a door, it really stood out to me because it shows how humans can take something simple and turn it into something people struggle with, which is also frustrating.

For me, it’s annoying when designers care more about how things look than how they function. It feels like they’re taking away the object’s purpose. It’s not just me who feels this way, because older generations also struggle with this. They have a hard time catching up with how the world functions now, so adding complexity to something that’s supposed to be simple just makes it harder for them. Sometimes it feels like designers expect us to admire their work without caring if we can actually use it. What’s the point of a nice-looking door if I don’t know how to open it? This applies to all kinds of things, not just objects, but whether it’s a phone app or a media project, it needs to be easy to use.

In today’s world, many products are designed with minimalism in mind. While they may look cool and modern, they often hide important functions. For example, take Kim Kardashian’s sink design in her house. The sink looks cool and ultra-modern, but it’s confusing because it doesn’t function like a regular sink. The surface is completely flat with no visible basin, and the water drains into a small slit. While the design looks unique and futuristic, it takes away from the sink’s practicality. When I saw it for the first time, my first thought was, “How does the tap work?” This is a perfect example of minimalist design taken too far, where the design hides or complicates something as simple as a sink’s basic function. The goal of making something aesthetically pleasing can actually make its usability hard and confusing.

Overall, I think the ideas of “discoverability” and “understanding” are important when it comes to the process of designing something. Discoverability helps someone figure out what to do, while understanding helps them know how it works. To me, these two concepts are essential to good design. This also applies to the media work I want to do. If something isn’t clear, the message gets lost. Good design should be so simple and natural that you don’t even think about it. That’s something I want to keep in mind for any future projects I create, whether in film, media, or design. In the end, I think it’s important not to overlook the balance between how something looks and how well it works.

CONCEPT:

For this assignment, I wanted to create generative art that involved text. While searching for inspiration, I came across Scott Garner’s work on Creative Blog, where he used p5.js to create an art piece with stars forming text against a night sky backdrop. This inspired me to explore how stars, randomness, and interaction could be combined to form dynamic, visually engaging text. For my piece, I will create stars that will scatter and form text shapes based on user interaction, blending order and randomness, just like Garner’s example. Ill also make it a space theme while exploring Gaussian distribution to add in the art background.

EMBEDDED SKETCH:

HIGHLIGHT OF MY CODE:

The best part of my code is the interactive switching feature that lets people switch between an arranged text and scattered stars. When you click on a button, this interaction starts. It’s a dynamic, responsive experience where stars move from randomly scattering to making a word. This is how the code works:

// Function to scatter the white dots randomly across the canvas
function scatterDots(canvasWidth, canvasHeight) {
  whiteDots.forEach(dot => {
    dot.currentX = random(canvasWidth);  // Set random x position within canvas width
    dot.currentY = random(canvasHeight);  // Set random y position within canvas height
  });
}

// Function to reset the white dots and stop forming the text
function resetDots() {
  formingText = false;  // Stop forming the text
  scatterDots(500, 500);  // Scatter the dots randomly across the canvas again
}

// Detect mouse presses and trigger button actions
function mousePressed() {
  buttons.forEach(button => {
    if (button.isClicked(mouseX, mouseY)) {  // Check if the button is clicked
      button.action();  // Execute the action tied to the button
    }
  });
}

In the code snippet shown above, I used three key functions to create interactivity and movement:

1. scatterDots(): This function scatters the white dots randomly across the canvas by assigning each dot a random x and y position within the canvas width and height. It adds randomness, simulating stars in the sky.
2.  resetDots(): This function resets the dots to scattered mode by setting ‘formingtext’ to false and calling again scatterDots().
3. mousePressed(): This function detects mouse presses and triggers button actions when the user clicks on the canvas, adding interactivity.

I used these functions to let users switch between random scatter mode and text formation mode based on button clicks. I figured out how to implement these by looking back at class PowerPoints and just experimenting until I got it right.

REFLECTION:

When I think back on this assigment, I like how the stars and the shooting star worked together to make a lively and interactive visual experience. The way the stars scattered and formed the text was just the right mix of randomness and order, just the way I imagined it would be. It looked more real and unpredictable because the shooting star moved in a Gaussian way.

For future updates, I’d like to look into adding more complex interactions. For example, users could drag to control how the stars or shooting stars move. In addition, improving the shooting star trail could make it look more real by making it fade more smoothly over time.

REFRENCES:

Garner, S. (2016, August 10). Explore creative code with p5.js. Creative Bloq. https://www.creativebloq.com/how-to/explore-creative-code-with-p5js.

 

Concept:

For this assignment, I honestly had no clue what to create, at first, I wanted to create generative text data; however, I couldn’t think of a sketch, so I decided to do visualization data instead. My concept was straightforward as I was still trying to understand the codes, so I decided to do a simple solar system, but the data wasn’t accurate it was just for the sketch and the placements in p5. I first started with a blank black background with the planets orbiting, which was too basic, so I decided to use the Lerp function, which I got my inspiration from Jheel’s assignment last week, to change the color to blue gradually. Furthermore, I added shooting stars and normal starts, to make it look more appealing.

Highlight:

The highlight of my code is the animation of the planets and setting the planets, as it was the hardest to figure out. However, the PowerPoint and previous in-class work helped a lot, and without them, I would still be trying to make it work.

// Draw and animate planets orbiting the sun
 for (let i = 0; i < planets.length; i++) {
   let planet = planets[i];

   // planet position based on orbit
   angles[i] += planet.speed;
   let x = sun.x + cos(angles[i]) * planet.distance;
   let y = sun.y + sin(angles[i]) * planet.distance;

   // Draw the orbit path
   stroke(255, 255, 255, 50);
   noFill();
   ellipse(sun.x, sun.y, planet.distance * 2);

   // Draw the planet
   noStroke();
   fill(planet.color);
   ellipse(x, y, planet.diameter);

   // Display planet name
   fill(255);
   textSize(12);
   text(planet.name, x + planet.diameter / 2 + 5, y);
 }

Reflection:

For improvements , as you can see the planet, are going out of the canavs, i tried fixing it by making the orbit smaller, but then everything look tight, so i left it as it is. Also I believe some user interaction would’ve been a great addition, as of now there isn’t any interaction, I should’ve maybe allowed the users to control the orbiting of the planets using the mouse, or maybe the shooting stars.

My design:

In Norman’s text, he argues for having a human-centered design, focusing on creating products that are simple and straightforward to use by aligning the design with what users need and can do. In context to that, one thing that drove me crazy (probably because I was really hungry) is how confusing digital appliances can be—like the air fryer I tried to use in the dorm. I expected it to be super easy, but instead, both me and Amna my sister, had to spend ages trying to figure out the functions because the instructions were just vague images and the digital display wasn’t clear. For someone who doesn’t cook often, it was frustrating to the point where I had to search TikTok to find out how to use it, and still it took ages to figure out as I had to find a similar Air fryer. To fix this, I think appliances like this should have built-in, interactive tutorials. Imagine turning on the air fryer for the first time and having it guide you step-by-step on the screen, showing you exactly how to use it. That way, you wouldn’t have to guess or waste time searching for help online.

In terms of applying Norman’s principles to interactive media, his ideas about affordances and signifiers would be super helpful. For example, in apps or websites, using clear icons or buttons that naturally show what they do would make everything easier to navigate. Also, feedback is key, like when you press a button, having a small animation or sound that lets you know the app is working on your request. It’s those little things that make the user experience smoother. Plus, having a simple design that allows users to quickly figure out how everything works without needing a tutorial, would make interactive media way more intuitive, kind of like how appliances should work right out of the box without you needing to look up instructions.

Concept:

For this assignment my main inspiration came from my niece, actually, during family lunch, she was playing around with a kaleidoscope, and i remembered how as a kid, I was so intrigued by them. I searched up inspirations and patterns online and i definitely wanted to try and create a design similar to a kaleidoscope. So i created jittery, dot shape that turns into this, flowy dot when you click on the mouse, just as how the shapes change when you rotate a kaleidoscope.

Reflection:

Honestly the code wasn’t as complex and was made up of mostly arrays, OOPS what we did in class mostly, and maybe next time i should try and be more complex with it and try new codes not taken in class, but I’m still very proud of the outcome. However, I did try sin and cos to create the waviness and jitter movements with the shape , which i got inspired from Amna’s previous code last week, and I’d say that’s the code I’m most proud of as it was something new to me that took some time to get right, but after reading about it on the P5 website, I figured it out, turns out it was just coordinates and using the function random to create those flowy movements, and this is the code that allows for the dots to then turn into wavy dots so it can then look like those squares when u click/toggle on the mouse, hence if I remove it the dots would just flow up and down or side to side instead of creating the square trail.

here is code im most proud of:

// Function to move the dot
move() {
  // Create two different movement patterns based on `flowDirection`
  if (flowDirection === 0) {
    this.x += random(-2, 2); // Random jitter in the x direction
    this.y += random(-2, 2); // Random jitter in the y direction
  } else {
    this.x += sin(this.y * 0.05) * 2; // Wavy movement based on the y-coordinate
    this.y += cos(this.x * 0.05) * 2; // Wavy movement based on the x-coordinate
  }

here is my sketch:

After reading the article “The Art of Interactive Designs,” I kept thinking about what makes something truly interactive. The author does point out that a good interactive system feels almost like a conversation, like there’s this back-and-forth where the system responds to what you’re doing in real time. It made me realize that a lot of systems or designs we think are “interactive” really aren’t, especially when they don’t actually engage with the user in a meaningful way. If something just sits there and doesn’t respond, it’s basically dead weight, no matter how fancy it looks.

 

In my opinion, it was interesting how the writer claims that interaction isn’t just about cool or flashy videos. its about making the user feel like there in control and that their input to that piece is important. Sometimes, I would see designs that look amazing but don’t actually respond well to the user. This means that I most likely overlooked my previous artwork I created in p5.js.  Yes, I’m proud that I was able to create art that looks cool, but if it’s not responsive or doesn’t react to what the user does, it’s not really interactive in the way it should be.

 

This article really pushed me into thinking about how I could improve my p5.js sketches to make them more interactive. Right now, for the assignment I’m doing this week, I feel like its a little bit flat, but they respond, but not in a way that feels satisfying. For instance, you can click a cube and it pops out, but that’s about it. I want to bring in smoother transitions, add more control options, and maybe even layer multiple interactions on top of each other. For example, what if clicking a cube changed its color, or if dragging across the screen triggered more than one animation? That’s the kind of engaging interaction the article talks about, and it’s the direction I want to head in. I really believe that real interaction should be immersive, and I think the article agrees on that too . I mean, from what I understood, its not about one thing happening at a time; its about creating a system that is consistently reacting to the user. In the future, I want my own projects to feel like they are alive and responding, not just a list of functions that don’t change.

CONCEPT:

For this art work, I’m going with a concept similar to my previous one and continuing the Velnor Molnar grid art. I was on the lookout for art pieces made with artists who used P5.js, and I found myself inspired by two standout visuals. I was really drawn to this vibrant 3D cube grid. It has so much depth and layers that it just stands out.

The next source of inspiration is a straightforward yet powerful idea known as the “Fading Grid.” The color changes are truly captivating, producing a gentle fading effect that evolves within the user interaction.

I’m thinking of combining both concepts. I’ll incorporate the 3D cube design and introduce some interactive color fading, drawing from both sources of inspiration. When you click on the mouse, the cubes shift, with the color changing within the user interaction to create movement in a way that feels interactive.I’m really looking forward to seeing how blending these two concepts will influence my final piece of art.

EMBEDDED SKETCH:

Click on the cubes!

HIGHLIGHT OF THE CODE:

One part of my piece where I’m really proud is how I changed the lighting of the cubes based on how the user moved their mouse. As the mouse moves toward a cube, it gets brighter. As the mouse moves away, it gets darker. This makes the background look smooth, which makes the cubes seem to be reacting to the user being there.

Continue reading “Assignment #3”