Week 12 – Reading Response

This week’s reading about design and disability has been eye-opening, prompting a shift in how I perceive both accessibility and aesthetics. It’s clear that the potential of design in creating assistive devices has been vastly underestimated. The notion that functionality must come at the expense of beauty is challenged, as exemplified by everyday items like glasses – seamlessly merging utility and style.

This realization aligns with the idea that good design goes beyond mere usability; it enhances user experience and self-perception. It’s not about creating universally bland solutions, but rather celebrating diversity through targeted designs that cater to individual needs and preferences. Involving artists and fashion designers in this process can inject a sense of identity and personal expression into assistive devices, transforming them from purely functional tools into extensions of oneself.

The shift in language, from “patients” to “wearers” and “hearing aids” to “HearWear,” further emphasizes this transformation. It moves away from medicalized labels and towards empowerment and individuality.

The idea of universal design resonated deeply as well. Creating things everyone can use and enjoy, like the curb cut example, demonstrates how good design benefits a wider range of people than initially intended. It’s not just about accessibility; it’s about smart and inclusive solutions. It’s always important to consider how to get more designers on board with inclusive design and ensure accessibility isn’t an afterthought. This involves asking crucial questions: How can we create a world where everyone feels welcome and valued? How do we ensure diverse needs and aspirations are met, not just accommodated? By merging functionality with individuality and embracing inclusive design principles, we can create a more accessible and empowering world for everyone.

Leave a Reply