I have personally never encountered the concept of computer vision before this reading. So, as I was reading it, I could not help but be amazed by the ways in which a concept as complex as computer vision can be manipulated to be used in different ways. It was very interesting for me to see the range of computer vision usage, going from military purposes to interactive art. To me, such a range showcases the duality of computers. It showcases that computers go beyond technicality but can actually encompass concepts that are typically seen as “non-technical.” The author also brought up different techniques to use computer vision such as frame differencing and brightness thresholding. The author’s introduction of different techniques for computer vision instilled the idea that we cannot simply rely on computers to create optimal outcomes. That is why a well prepared environment is almost always needed to help create optimal outcomes that could be generated by the computer itself.
Thus, the relevance of user interaction comes into play. Are humans vital for the success of computer vision systems? Do we need to play an active role to ensure that computer vision systems are optimized correctly? In my eyes, the significance of the physical environment in regards to computer vision underscores the role human interaction plays in shaping the functionality of computer vision systems. Humans are able to manipulate and optimize the environment to enhance the performance of computer vision systems. Whether it is simply adjusting lighting or placing sensors in the environment, human intervention plays a vital role in computer vision systems. Other than this, it is users’ interaction with computer vision systems that determine the interpretation and utilization of its output. Therefore, human intervention is essential for harnessing the full potential of computer vision, ensuring it runs successfully. To me, the idea of computer vision as displayed by the author showcases the interconnected nature of computers and users and that one is somewhat always dependent on the other for success.