Reading Response – Week 11

This week’s reading, titled “Design meets disability,” intrigued me with its exploration of the intersection between design and the needs of individuals with disabilities. Prior to this, I hadn’t given much thought to the design aspects of products catering to the disabled community. My initial perspective was primarily focused on functionality, deeming it sufficient. However, the author emphasizes that functionality alone may not be the sole consideration. The incorporation of aesthetic appeal in design plays a crucial role in enhancing the user’s self-image.

The author delves into the analysis of various items such as spectacles (now referred to as eyewear), prosthetics, and other adaptive “equipment” designed for individuals with different abilities. It made me reflect on the challenges of introducing fashion into this realm, especially considering the diversity of needs. Unlike spectacles, which serve users regardless of eyesight effectiveness, prosthetics and hearing aids pose unique challenges. How can someone without amputation use a prosthetic, or how can individuals without hearing impairment benefit from hearing aids?

The transformation of spectacles into trendy “eyewear” appears to have been a successful evolution, but I question whether similar success is feasible for other assistive devices tailored for individuals with special needs. The reading has prompted me to consider the intricacies and complexities involved in merging design and functionality, particularly in the context of products meant to aid those with disabilities.

Leave a Reply