After this thought-provoking read, I wholeheartedly feel that a design should be universally accessible, catering to everyone’s needs. Imagine the convenience of a singular product that eliminates the need for individuals to ponder, “Will this suit my requirements?” or “Is this tailored for a specific group?” Although implementing such universality might pose challenges for designers, the benefits could be substantial.
This approach would eradicate the apprehension associated with designing for differently-abled individuals, as it wouldn’t be perceived as mediocre or subpar when designed for a broader audience. The return of a sense of ‘delight’ in everyday products could be achieved through a more inclusive design, fostering unity rather than segregation. While certain disabilities may require specialized technology, there are aspects we can universalize for everyone.
What particularly intrigued me is the question of whether we should project a positive image or refrain from projecting an image altogether. Striking a balance that avoids exclusion and encourages accommodation is crucial. Examples related to fashion, discretion, and simplicity prompted me to contemplate how, as someone pursuing interactive media, I can contribute to bridging the gap between realism and functionalism. The oldest ipod nano that my father owned used to be my favorite device. The familiarity of the tracker wheel mentioned in the text resonates with me.
Reflecting on my five-year-old self effortlessly navigating it, I realize the design and feedback were exceptionally well-executed. It serves as a possibility of achieving a harmonious intersection of simplicity, functionality, and aesthetics—providing inspiration for designers and me, particularly to aim to strike that delicate balance.The idea of embracing cultural differences in embracing fashion and technology did sound a little strange at first but I agree that it would definitely be a call to action for more innovative and accessible design.