Physical Computing’s Greatest Hits (and Misses) & Making Interactive Art: Set the Stage, Then Shut Up and Listen
Both readings provided me with valuable information and insights regarding physical computing and the concept of interactive art. They share a common theme centered around originality and interpretation. The article on physical computing illustrates how even seemingly commonplace projects possess a unique touch each time different individuals recreate them. In my view, a person’s subtle influences, expressions, intentions, and interpretations of their project imbue it with a distinct originality and authenticity. Each creator infuses the project with passion, interest, and a personal story, though not always evident to the audience. This unique narrative provides value to the project unless it is an exact copy without any differences, purpose, or clear story.
Transitioning to the second article on interactive art, I concur with the author’s stance that artists should not fully disclose their interpretation and explanation of their artwork. Allowing the audience to form their own interpretations enhances the art’s impact. However, I disagree with the author’s assertion that art is solely a statement and not an expression. I firmly believe that the beauty of art lies in the story behind it, not necessarily the artist’s interpretation, but their experiences, as the author emphasizes, the art “sets the stage”; meaning that you give some insight of your experience, life, or just some context for the audience and give them a chance to interpret it on their own, since that is also one of the factors that prove the quality of an art work.
From my perspective, interactive art encompasses various fields, ranging from intricately detailed works with rich narratives to visually appealing, randomized creations. Regardless of the project type, it invariably reflects the artist’s expression. Even if the final result involves intentional or unintentional randomness, this randomness is infused with a story, emotions, and connections between perspectives, ideas, and life experiences. Even when the artist is not consciously deliberate in their production, they make decisions based on their interpretation of their own art. In some cases, the result may simply be visually appealing but still open to interpretation. Thus, I believe art can indeed make a statement, but it will always carry an expression to varying extents.