In this week’s reading, “Making Interactive Art: Set the Stage, Then Shut Up and Listen” the author set out the fundamental nature of interactive art as free and uncontrolling. He argues that artists should never impose or provide their intentions or interpretation of the artwork to the viewer. This field of art calls for the complex nature of human thought to allow the viewer to explore unique interpretations impacted by personal experiences. I found this idea to be particularly relatable as I often witness people having entirely different viewpoints regarding pieces of art. I also feel that if an artist provides their interpretation or explanation, it limits the viewer from exploring their thoughts as they begin to believe that there is only one right understanding of the art. Providing viewers with the freedom to think brings out their true reaction and adds greater depth to the interactive art. It may also be possible for the artist to discover a new dimension of their own work which they may not have previously considered. Hence, I completely agree with the argument presented by the author and firmly believe that the world of interactive art is all about exploring yourself through the displays.
The second reading, “Physical Computing’s Greatest Hits (and misses)”, felt like an unexplored world of opportunities. I was intrigued to read about the numerous projects created using various aspects of physical computing. It has also provided with an inspiration to think more creatively for future assignments. It was interesting to note that all involved relatively similar components and yet were so diverse in concept and implementation.