In my initial perspective, I approached the interaction in physical computing from a strictly practical standpoint. However, the revelation brought about by the mechanical pixels and the surrounding fields of grass has broadened my understanding, highlighting the potential for creativity and aesthetics in these interactions. Previously, I considered the user’s input as the primary influence, shaping the device’s responses accordingly. Yet, the mechanical pixels and the grassy environment exhibit a distinct “will of technology.” Despite their simplicity, they engage with their surroundings not merely to fulfill a predetermined purpose dictated by humans, but to actively create an interaction with people. An illustrative example is the subtle quivering of the mechanical pixel “leaves” in an attempt to attract attention when no one is nearby. As individuals pass by, they collectively form a wave, accompanied by a tinkling sound, showcasing a dynamic and engaging interaction that transcends the conventional user-device relationship.
After delving into Tigoe’s “Making Interactive Art,” my perspective on interaction and interactivity has evolved. Initially, I conceived these concepts as a straightforward exchange where two entities respond to each other through inputs and outputs. However, Tigoe’s insights have led me to perceive interactivity as a more nuanced and profound experience. The excerpt from “Making Interactive Art” that resonated with me emphasizes the importance of letting the audience absorb the work through their senses, encouraging them to contemplate the meaning of each part, identify elements open to contact or control, and ultimately empowering them to interpret and respond in their own unique ways.
This perspective reframes interactivity as a process that places emphasis on the receiving end, highlighting the significance of allowing individuals to engage with artistic or interactive creations on a personal and subjective level. Rather than a uniform response to inputs, true interactivity, as suggested by Tigoe, enables a diverse range of interpretations and responses. In this light, I now see interaction not only as a means of communication but also as a pathway for individuals to feel a sense of uniqueness, care, and individuality within the realm of human experience.