Physical Computing’s Greatest Hits (and misses)
What made this reading very interesting for me is that It’s all about those recurring themes in physical computing classes, and I must say, I have a soft spot for them. There’s something truly special about the way they offer a playground for creativity and innovation.
What really tickles my fancy is how Tigoe encourages us not to view these recurring themes as stale or unoriginal. Instead, he invites us to look at them as blank canvases ready for our artistic interpretation. It’s like he’s saying, “Hey, don’t shy away from these themes – they’re your chance to shine!”
Now, when we talk about themes like “Theremin-like instruments” and “Gloves,” I can’t help but get excited. I mean, who wouldn’t love the idea of creating music simply by waving their hands around? It’s not just cool; it’s a testament to the magic of human-computer interaction. And those dance pads inspired by Dance Dance Revolution? They’re pure nostalgia and joy wrapped up in a project. It’s like turning your favorite pastime into an interactive art form.
But it’s not all about play; there’s an element of challenge too. Tigoe talks about how we can add meaning to these themes by creating a physical form and context that turns simple gestures into something meaningful. That’s where the artistry comes in. It’s about infusing technology with a touch of human emotion.
And let’s not forget “LED Fetishism.” I mean, who can resist the allure of those blinking LEDs? It’s like a canvas waiting to be painted with light. The possibilities are endless, and it’s a guilty pleasure for tech enthusiasts like me. You can turn a simple LED into a work of art if you let your creativity run wild.
In the grand scheme of things, this article is a reminder that technology can be a tool for self-expression and creativity. It’s a canvas, and these recurring themes are like a familiar backdrop that sets the stage for our innovation. So, what’s not to like about that? It’s an invitation to turn everyday actions into interactive adventures, and I’m all in for that kind of excitement!
Making Interactive Art: Set the Stage, Then Shut Up and Listen
When I read this piece, it’s like a little reminder that sometimes, as artists, we tend to over-explain our creations. We put our hearts and souls into our work, and it’s only natural to want to guide others in understanding it. However, this article argues that in interactive art, there’s a beauty in leaving room for interpretation.
You see, interactive art isn’t just about creating a statement; it’s about sparking a conversation. It’s about building a stage where the audience becomes the actors. The artist sets the scene, provides the props, but then steps back and lets the audience take the spotlight.
It’s a bit like a director working with actors. You can’t tell an actor exactly how to feel or what to do to convey a particular emotion authentically. You can guide them, suggest intentions, but the true interpretation and expression come from within them. The same goes for interactive art. You design the environment, you set the stage, but you don’t need to hand-hold the audience through every step.
Instead, you offer them the basic context, suggest sequences through placement, and then let them explore. It’s like a silent invitation, a conversation between the art and the viewer. What you’ve created becomes a canvas for their emotions and thoughts.
And it’s not a one-way street. As the audience interacts with your work, they become part of this ongoing dialogue. Their reactions, their understanding, their misunderstandings – it’s all part of the artistic conversation. Some may be moved emotionally, while others might not immediately grasp the message. Some may even inspire and teach others about the work.
It’s a dynamic process, much like a performance. The audience becomes an integral part of your creation, shaping it with their responses. In a way, the art isn’t truly complete until the audience has added their unique layer to it.