In my opinion, this reading challenges the idea that design for disability should only focus on solving problems. The prosthetic designs by Aimee Mullins show that disability can spark bold and exciting ideas, not just practical solutions. I think this mindset is what’s missing in most assistive designs today. Why settle for blending in when design can help people stand out and feel empowered? Similarly, the trend of customizing prosthetic eyes with unique designs—like intricate patterns or bold colors—proves that assistive devices can be about self-expression. These designs don’t try to look like a “normal” eye; instead, they let people proudly showcase their personalities. This is exactly the kind of creativity the design world needs.
The reading also points out a major flaw in how we think about inclusivity in design. Universal design sounds great in theory, but trying to make one product fit everyone often dilutes its purpose. For example, overly adjustable furniture for kids with disabilities can end up alienating them instead of including them. Instead of trying to be “one size fits all,” designers should focus on creating multiple, simple solutions that truly meet the needs of different individuals. This isn’t about making disability invisible—it’s about making design human and the diversity that comes with it.