Reflecting on Norman’s insights from “The Psychopathology of Everyday Things, Chapter:1” I find myself deeply considering the complexity hidden within simple everyday objects like doors, refrigerators, and watches. Norman points out that the designs meant to simplify our lives can sometimes make them more complicated instead. This resonates with me because I’ve often found myself frustrated by appliances and gadgets (like smart watches, bluetooth coffee maker) that have too many features. These features, instead of making the device better, can make it harder to use. Norman’s argument makes me rethink the belief that having more features means better functionality. My own experiences support this idea, as I’ve struggled with devices that seem to prioritize complexity over ease of use.
Furthermore, Norman’s critique makes me wonder about the true purpose of design. Is it more important for a product to look good and have lots of features than to be easy to use? This challenges the current trend in design, where form and complexity often take precedence over simplicity and functionality. Norman seems to favor designs that are straightforward and user-friendly, which makes me question my own ideas about what makes a design “good.” Previously, I might have thought that the more technologically advanced a product is, the better it is. However, Norman’s perspective has made me see the value in designs that balance functionality, simplicity, and elegance. This shift in thinking opens up new questions about how designers can create products that are both advanced and accessible. As technology evolves, finding the right balance will be crucial for creating products that enhance our lives without adding unnecessary complexity.