Week 10 – Reading response

I found the author’s examples to be exceptionally thought-provoking. The illustration of playing the piano on a screen, like an iPad, particularly caught my attention. It led me to question the necessity of such technology. Why should we replicate complex tactile experiences on a two-dimensional surface? It highlighted the gap between the potential of human capabilities and the constraints imposed by current technological paradigms.

At its core, it seems the author is urging people to break free from traditional norms and cease restricting their thinking. There’s a profound call for a paradigm shift, a departure from the familiar and the comfortable.

The idea that technology doesn’t simply happen but is a result of choices, research, and inspired individuals resonated with me. The call to be inspired by the untapped potential of human capabilities struck a chord. It’s a call to action, urging us to reconsider the choices we make in technology development and funding. The historical reference to Alan Kay’s visionary leap serves as a powerful reminder that groundbreaking ideas often emerge from unconventional thinking.

The notion that we’ve become a generation tethered to desks, couches, and sedentary modes of transportation, necessitating artificial interventions like exercise to stave off bodily atrophy, struck a resonant chord. It not only underscores the physical implications of our evolving relationship with technology but also leads to a broader question about the increasing automation permeating every facet of our lives.

As we integrate technology into more aspects of our daily existence, there’s a palpable risk of creating a future where convenience comes at the cost of mobility and physical engagement. The critique of sitting as a prevailing posture for work, leisure, and transit raises concerns about the potential consequences of an increasingly automated lifestyle. Are we inadvertently designing a future where the need for bodily movement diminishes, contributing to a sedentary existence mediated by screens and devices?

Leave a Reply